Does a Thing Have Value Just Because We SAY it Does?

With the crypto markets once again on the rise, and the market cap of Bitcoin being well above a trillion dollars, and the market cap of all crypto tokens being well above two trillion dollars I find myself pondering the age old question about "value" is.

20240516_024747.jpg

Moreover, I find myself posing the question of who determines what value actually is? What has value?

It's not always an easy concept for people to grasp, but value is what we decide that it is.

Perhaps that sounds a bit cryptic, but ultimately value is very hard to tangibly define, because it is ultimately nothing more than an agreement between multiple parties as to the worth of something.

If that sounds like so much rubbish consider this scenario: In the zombie apocalypse what do you think has more value: an intact can of beans or an iPhone?

20240404_010835.jpg

In other words, value is an agreement. But what has value? And can we give something value simply by declaring it has value even if it actually doesn't have any tangible value? Consider NFTs, for a moment.

Consider the fact that I have been a dealer in Old Paper collectibles, and I have on occasion sold old postage stamps for upwards of $500. Does a tiny square of paper 1 inch on each side actually have any tangible value? It's old, and therefore brittle, it's very small so you can't write anything on it and you can't start a fire with it so why does it have value?

It only has value because some collectors of postage stamps are in alignment that this specific item is interesting and desirable and "I want it" and I wanted enough that this is the value I assigned to it.

20240311_013023.jpg

Many many years ago when we lived in Kenya, they were still some small villages out in the countryside where local tradesmen would rather be paid with cowries - a form of seashell - than with the official Kenyan shilling.

Nonsense! How can a seashell you can pick up at the seashore have value? Not a question I can answer... it's simply a fact that this particular group of indigenous people determined that in their world cowries had value as a trading unit.

What does that have to do with the beginnings of a potential crypto bull run? What does this have to do with web 3.0?

Again, it comes back to value. And it comes back to who determines what value is and what has value. In this world where we can pretty much tokenize everything I can essentially declare that my pocket lint has value and mint a token to represent the value of that pocket lint.

20240207_142940.jpg

Whether that pocket lint and the LINT token actually has value... well that depends on the agreement between me and other people who perhaps are interested in studying pocket lint, or are collectors of pocket lint from around the world.

What's my point here? Well as I see it, just because we can tokenize absolutely everything does that mean it's necessarily the right thing to do? Do we need to make some kind of revolutionary change to the world of everything to declare that thin air suddenly has value and it needs to be traded.

That seems to me to be a bit of a flimsy house of cards! Unless, of course, we are suddenly at risk of running out of thin air...

I suppose the ultimate question might become one of where we draw some kind of bottom line. We can keep issuing tokens to our hearts' content and declare that arbitrary things we see around us somehow "have value" and deserve to be tokenized, but if you take a step back and take the hundred thousand foot overview it's not really all that different from conventional governments setting the Fiat printing presses to run and just spitting out more and more and more money in a pretense that that somehow makes us "wealthier."

20230718_015645.jpg

But does it actually?

I have my doubts. Ultimately what we're doing is based on resources and dividing up resources and allocating resources between individuals and organizations.

Presenting something that isn't actually a resource as a resource and saying it has value doesn't actually give it value. And if I come up to you with my LINT token I doubt very much you're going to buy it unless of course you perceive that somebody is going to do a pump and dump and you can be part of the front end of that!

Which circles are straight back to the beginning, and the question of whether we're creating something out of thin air.

20231209_234415.jpg

We may be sending at the edge of a whole brand new paradigm, but we ultimately end up back where we've always been. Unless... there is some kind of observable utility to what you're offering it doesn't generally have much of a chance to succeed in the long run.

If you've been around long enough, you might remember those crazy chain letters that would go around 30, 40, 50 years ago. You send a dollar each to a bunch of people on a list, and the idea is that they send a dollar each to a bunch of people and so on so forth and you pay somebody up the road for sending you this Chain Letter. And after a while you'll end up with $250,000!

But here's the kicker. You don't actually end up with 250,000. Most likely you end up with $30 worth of postage costs and nothing.

And the thing is, if it actually worked, absolutely everybody would be doing it and they would all be getting $250,000, and if everybody suddenly had $250,000... you could go to the supermarket and chances are that a loaf of bread would cost you $250,000.

20240110_225322.jpg

We keep trying to come up with ways in which life is not a zero-sum game but nobody has managed to cheat that parricular paradigm as of yet.

Meanwhile, I'm holding on to my tokens and hope that this is the beginning of a bull market that'll end up getting me paid for these words about pretty much nothing!

Thanks for stopping by and have a great Friday!

Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment — share your experiences — be part of the conversation! I do my best to answer comments, even if it sometimes takes a few days!

HivePanda.gif


Greetings bloggers and social content creators! This article was created via PeakD, a blogging application that's part of the Hive Social Content Experience. If you're a blogger, writer, poet, artist, vlogger, musician or other creative content wizard, come join us! Hive is a little "different" because it's not run by a "company;" it operates via the consensus of its users and your content can't be banned, censored, taken down or demonetized. And that COUNTS for something, in these uncertain times! So if you're ready for the next generation of social content where YOU retain ownership and control, come by and learn about Hive and make an account!

Proud member of the Silver Bloggers Community on Hive! Silverbloggers Logo

(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly and uniquely for this platform — NOT posted anywhere else!)
Created at 2024-05-24 01:03 PDT

1154/2411



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

Value is a manmade construct so not only does a thing have value because we say it has value, but also a thing can't have value unless we say it does. If someone is on a deserted island: nothing has value. Price, value, and money only exist as a network between large groups of people that don't necessarily trust each other. Without the network they don't exist.

Presenting something that isn't actually a resource as a resource and saying it has value doesn't actually give it value.

Who decides what is and is not a "resource"?

This is a slippery slope because now I can use it to claim that things like art don't have value. Art has no practical value so therefore it must be worthless. Right? Because feelings and emotional states are worthless. Everyone should just be a robot otherwise they're wasting resources.

In the context of crypto sure we'd all like to say that meme-coins don't have value. But to say that is also to deny the emotions that surround the shitcoin casino and the value of experimenting with cutting edge tech in weird and potentially stupid ways. There are plenty of inventions that were created completely by accident, and that never happens if we don't color outside the lines.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Without a doubt, we have to be willing to color outside the lines... in fact, there are many cases where "the lines" make no sense, at all.

When I'm on that deserted island and hungry, a wild pig suddenly has value because I'm hungry. If I'm not hungry, perhaps it has value as a pet/companion. The whole thing is rather, nebulous, to be sure.

There are some interesting dichotomies in the whole experience, though! I agree that things like art, entertainment and feelings do have a value of sorts — to me — but the even if the consensus-ish opinion of the aggregate human experience is that they don't, to a great degree. People will pay you for gold and diamonds, but be very reluctant to pay for art and... feelings. And yet all of these are driven by a feeling component... ego and FOMO.

Just interesting thoughts to bat around!

0
0
0.000
avatar

In principle, anything that is not within a competitive supply/demand marketplace has no value at all. Both conditions are required to be present in order that something may acquire or gain value (price). Obviously all these concepts only express "value" in Monetary Terms as a method of exchanging goods. On the other hand, the value of things can only be thought, appreciated and perceived in terms of "costs" and "benefits." There will always have to be producers and consumers of something, so that that "something" can acquire some value.

Because otherwise, everything, absolutely everything has the potential to become valuable just by complying with the premise indicated at the beginning of this comment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I love that you bring this topic up. I’ve been thinking about a post around the idea of truth with a similar thought process and line of questioning. Unlike value, I think truth is definite unlike truth value is subjective. That’s the best I can come up with. thanks for writing this post and asking interesting questions. It was a great read.

0
0
0.000
avatar

OVER REWARDED TRASH

HIVE IS DEAD

HIVE IS ONE BIG FARM

!LOL !WEED !MEME

60 votes
slobberchops [-]
gogreenbuddy [-]
cmplxty [-]
shanibeer [-]
antisocialist [-]
azabu [-]
acram64 [-]
mypathtofire [-]
willowranger [-]
bscrypto [-]
dhedge [-]
aaronkroeblinger [-]
lichtkunstfoto [-]
memehub [-]
chekohler [-]
modernzorker [-]
carn [-]
earthsea [-]
pinkhub [-]
kaylinart [-]
and 40 more

https://hive.blog/hive-104387/@bpcvoter3/se19g2

Downvoted BY HIVE FARMERS

slobberchops (81)in #life • 6 days ago
The_commentphant.jpg

6 days ago in #life by slobberchops (81)$0.00
Reply 3
Sort: Trending
[-]bpcvoter2 (-5)(1) 4 days ago · Will be hidden due to low rating
NO DOWNVOTES FOR MARKY MARK'S SELF VOTING !WEED

https://hive.blog/life/@slobberchops/re-gogreenbuddy-sdr1wb

https://www.publish0x.com/the-dark-side-of-hive

https://www.reddit.com/r/stoptheabuseonhive/

https://peakd.com/hive-164833/@bilpcoinbpc/you-have-all-witnessed-this-account-being-downvoted-to-a-negative-reputation-for-no-reason

SHAME ON YOU ALL SAD PEOPLE WHO SCAM LIE AND FARM HIVE AND HIVERS

[-]acidyo (82) 3 months ago
Haha at "I shouldn't make commercial" :D Maybe something to worry about when you have more youtube subscribers! Quite interesting content though, these things should get more subs on there and here.

$4.28
1 vote
Reply
[-]gogreenbuddy (67) 3 months ago
Yeah thought that was funny too

$4.54
4 votes
gogreenbuddy: $4.47
acidyo: $0.06
holbein81: $0.01
koleso: -$0.00

https://hive.blog/life/@gogreenbuddy/i-had-to-give-up-on-my-gabion-fencing-too-much-work

0
0
0.000