What Are Eyeballs Really Worth?
No, I'm not talking about the black market for human body parts!
In this case, I'm talking about the eyeballs that look at the things we create online. Could be essays, could be videos, could be blogs, could even be tweets or memes.
Historically, the value of eyeballs have substantially depended on large numbers.
On pretty much every platform I contributed to that offered some sort of compensation to creators (prior to Hive), it was all a game of numbers. And typically, it required thousands and thousands of pairs of eyeballs to look at your content before it was considered to have any value at all.
These days, the idea is that web 3.0 is going to change that, although I am not entirely sure by what mechanism.
Now, I can understand a model where eyeballs start to have greater value if you have some sort of subscription scheme. What I'm struggling with is this idea that something that has previously been worth maybe a few dollars per thousand eyeballs suddenly is worth $0.50 per individual pair of eyeballs. Or something like that.
The page view didn't magically become worth 100 times what it used to be. Well, maybe it could if you are OK with hyperinflation... then you can say that!
I'm only half joking there.
Historically speaking, revenue based models have shown that eyeballs are not worth a whole lot of money. The thing I always end up questioning is this idea that eyeballs suddenly are worth a lot more... based on nothing in particular. Maybe they're worth more simply because we say so and we give you more.
Whereas that is fine and dandy for the recipient, perhaps in the short term, but how is it sustainable?
Using myself as an example, the moment I encounter some kind of "paywall," I tend to just click through to somewhere else. I can't imagine I'm unique!
Pretty much everything in life has to come from somewhere.
When you eat a steak for dinner, it didn't just appear out of thin air like magical Unicorn dust... it came from a cow and there was a whole line of the people involved in bringing you that steak to your table, and it's likely that steak didn't appear on your table until you'd forked over $10 a pound for the meat.
Certainly pretending that the steak is free simply because somebody says "steak is free" is certainly a nice idea but how does it become sustainable? Where does the perpetual supply of free steaks come from?
As far as I know, the cattle still has to be farmed somewhere.
Of course, web content is not steaks, but you still have to come up with the appropriate value somewhere.
Thanks for stopping by and have a great Sunday!
Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment — share your experiences — be part of the conversation! I do my best to answer comments, even if it sometimes takes a few days!
Greetings bloggers and social content creators! This article was created via PeakD, a blogging application that's part of the Hive Social Content Experience. If you're a blogger, writer, poet, artist, vlogger, musician or other creative content wizard, come join us! Hive is a little "different" because it's not run by a "company;" it operates via the consensus of its users and your content can't be banned, censored, taken down or demonetized. And that COUNTS for something, in these uncertain times! So if you're ready for the next generation of social content where YOU retain ownership and control, come by and learn about Hive and make an account!
(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly and uniquely for this platform — NOT posted anywhere else!)
Created at 2024-07-07 01:33 PDT
1179/2436
Back in the 90's and into the new millennia advertisers (primarily with banner ads) were using the same buckshot approach of radio and television models. To find that one customer took 100's of uninterested eyes to pay for itself.
Today with meta data and being able to zero in on the exact target demographics changes the value of eyeballs drastically. Each eyeball could be an exact target demographic match.
I try to write content with some degree of timeless value so long after HIVE token payout, readers still benefit. I don't really care about the quantity of eyes, though. I know my ideas and interests have niche markets. I hope to just reach the right eyes now and then.
As for the Web2.0 push for more "reach" and "engagement," I think the mediocrity of mainstream social media is an obvious demonstration of the consequences there just as traditional broadcast media trended toward the banal previously.