The great AI debate!

avatar

So, Sloth being a sloth, I'm finally touching more on the great AI debate!

imgflip

Should we use it? Should we abuse it? Should we vote for it? These are the questions that go around with each AI post, be it images, memes or text.

Of course, we can all agree that there are some amazing advantages to using AI, from creating multiple images instantaneously, to full blog posts (Sometimes even creating the code for the blog itself) and music, memes and videos! There's an AI for everything these days.

imgflip meme

So, AI is good? Right?

Or is it? Will it take over the world? Push out all "real" creators?

Could...well, there's no could about it, you CAN use AI, to build your blogging website, and blog daily for you. Adding images, videos and other content as required. The question is, SHOULD we vote for it on Hive? Should we contribute Hive rewards to "creators" only using AI, or should we focus on "real" artists?

imgflip meme

img flip meme

I've dabbled in some AI creations myself, using some AI-generated images for several posts. I've seen many "digital art" posts, basically, just people explaining what the AI spits out, some get "High" votes. The question is, should we continue to support those posts, or should we allow AI text-generated blogs and upvote those?

I'd love to hear your opinions, I occasionally use AI, from images to memes as seen in my last post, and I try to always cite the source, be it AI or manual production. Would this take the sting out of voting for AI, at least if you know it's AI you can make a decision whether to support it or not.

What happens when AI posts start appearing, daily, with "good" content? (It's super smart, it's not going to produce mediocre content!?) Will we all be tricked into supporting 99% bot accounts? Creating and posting with minimal interaction from anyone "real"? Or can we outlast the Bots and continue producing "real" content?

slothbuzz meme lolz pimp hivepizza scribe freewriting ai hiveengine leo
0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

I think yes, we should use AI-generated textes as additional tool. I am not wetware biased.
I also think, an intelligence whether AI or human, should be treated the same. If an alien appeared on Earth, we also should not discriminate it because it is not human origin. So why not use AI for blogging? For me the content is important, not who wrote it. As long there is a value provided in the post, why not? Same with pictures.
The only condition should be, that the source of the text should be mentioned.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I’ve tried the AI for producing content, on factual based things “what is” “how does x work” it’s great, producing accurate and clear instructions.

Creatively it has pretty astounding results also, it could easily be used to produce continue nonfiction content. It’ll be interesting to see how people utilise it in future, I’d agree, with it being used as long as it was sourced. Should we reward it to the same level as “normal” content is my quandary.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Depends, I curate mostly according to the (estimated) amount of work put into a post (and if I like it). Others might be only interested in the result, regardless how it was done.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

It is a debate but at the end of the day, be kind to the AI and hopefully when the robot uprising happens we all get a quick death or mercy :)

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Yeah, hoping they’ll get round to us sloths last, or maybe first…quick mercy may be better than prolonged slavery at the hands (buttons?) of our AI overlords.

Sloths make great pets for robots, we don’t need much! Love you Ai leader

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

It might be a tough fight to avoid being tricked. Still, between AI and humans, we vote for humans and their real content.
!ALIVE | !BBH | !PIZZA

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

@slothlydoesit! Your Content Is Awesome so I just sent 1 $BBH (Bitcoin Backed Hive) to your account on behalf of @vocup. (11/20)

0
0
0.000
Reply