Why you should work towards the decentralisation of Hive

avatar

Hive is a blockchain that is different from most others. In my opinion, that probably not everybody shares, Hive gets better the more decentralised it is. In this post I will try to explain why and why you should do everything possible to increase this decentralisation.

There are many aspects of decentralisation

Decentralisation can be defined in many ways so I won't try to propose here some definition that I found somewhere on the internet. For me decentralisation is everything that goes against centralisation, or the concentration of a processus or power in the hands of only a few people.

Decentralised infrastructure

When people talk about a decentralised blockchain they often think about the infrastructure aspect. How is the data spread over the world? How resilient is it to attacks? How many people control it? On Hive we have 25 Witnesses and a certain number of back up witnesses that make sure that the blockchain continues working. The infrastructure is pretty decentralised but I'm not really a specialist in this respect and I don't know whether the decentralisation of the infrastructure could be improved.

Decentralised decision mechanisme

Who decides how a blockchain should evolve? Who decides on the changes in the code? Who creates the code for the next fork? This is actually pretty important and again this is often not really taken into consideration when speaking about decentralisation. Some chains can't really evolve because they are hard coded. Other chains have a decision processus or a DAO where people can vote on the process.

Decentralised token distribution

This is an aspect that is often not enough taken into consideration when speaking about decentralisation. It is how the tokens are distributed among the users. How many people hold a very significant stake of the token? How many people hold tokens? This matters actually quite a lot on Hive because the hive token in it's powered up form gives a lot of power on the chain. If the token distribution is centralised, it means that few people have a lot of power and the big majority has little power at all.

For me this is the most important factor that can be influenced by us and it can also lead to better decentralisation of all the other aspects. I'm sure I'm missing other aspects but what I want to draw your attention to here is that there are many aspects of decentralisation and they really matter to each of us.

The more decentralised a system is, the less power it gives to individuals

Hive is built for decentralisation

Hive is special because in adition to a proof of stake mechanisme, we also have a proof of brain mechanisme that favourises decentralisation.

With the proof of stake mechanisme your stake can only grow when you already own a certain stake. It's a kind of interest that you get for holding your stake. The only way to grow your influence on a POS chain is to buy in.

On Hive, it is actually possible to grow your stake thanks to your work. By producing content you can earn stake. This is quite unique and with every post that gets some value we are actually enforcing decentralisation. The reward pot is distributed to many different authors. At the same time, stake holders earn through the curation rewards. Which kind of makes everybody involved happy.

Why you should work towards the decentralisation of hive power

On hive, the more hive power is concentrated on one account or on one project, the more this account or project has power. This account can distribute a big part of the reward pool. It can define who is a witness. It can define who gets the support of the DHO. The more Hive is concentrated, the fewer people decide about everything and define who gets rewarded.

The more decentralised Hive becomes, the more it becomes democratic and resilient:

- effect on curation

If everybody delegates their hive power to only 3-4 curation projects, it will reduce the spread of votes. If we had a much bigger number of independent curation projects, more votes would be cast and more people would get rewarded. Let's say that every curation project has 3 curators (pure estimation). Each of these curators can curate 10 posts per day. If we have 4 curation projects, only 120 posts get upvoted by these projects. If we had 40 curation projects, then 1200 posts would get upvoted and the tokens would be spread more widely.

- effect on witness voting

With the present structure the top 20 stake holders on hive can define more or less among themselves all the top 25 witnesses of hive. They can vote up to 30 times and therefore with their consequent power, they define who is in and who is out. If there were 10 times more whales, this would be totally different and we might have a totally different structure when it comes to who are in the top 25. This also matters when it comes to how the chain evolves. It's the witnesses that define which code will be included in the next hard fork.

- effect on DHO

At the moment, almost no project can get funded without the support of the top stake holders. They more or less decide among themselves which project should be supported and which project should not. If we had more dolphins and orcas they could make sure that projects get funded even without the support of the few whales.

A word regarding the top stake holders on Hive: Maybe you get now the feeling that the whales are exploiting the blockchain. They are actually not. We are lucky to have Whales that look after this blockchain and act in it's best interest. However, we shouldn't simply rely on the fact that it will always be like that. We have the chance to make hive better and more resilient simply by working towards a more decentralised token distribution.

How you can improve the decentralisation on Hive

There are many small things that you can do to improve decentralisation on hive which in the long term will actually help you and help Hive.

  • Grow your Hive Power as much as possible. You are an important part of hive and of the process towards decentralisation. The more your hive power grows, the more your power on the chain grows!
  • Either curate yourself and if you don't have time, delegate to as many curation projects as possible. Avoid the biggest ones and favorise the smaller ones. By delegating your hive power, you give your power away to others. Try to spread this power as much as possible.
  • Make sure that you use your witness votes
  • Make sure that you vote on DHO projects that you find interesting
  • Encourage the people around you to do the things above

Hive is pretty decentralised but it can definitely become much better in this respect if we all step up and take some power into our hands. We can define the future of this blockchain!


With @ph1102, I'm running the @liotes project.

Please consider supporting our Witness nodes:



0
0
0.000
30 comments
avatar

Hahahahahahhaha!

But acidyo and ocd own the block chain.

So it's centralized. Unless they want to sell.off and give up power. But then they wouldn't be able to bully ecency and other programs and communities.

Hive is screwed. OCD and this group of centralized bullies ran off the majority of the community.

Look at the metrics. We are not growing. We are collapsing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's the people who delegate hive power to projects that tend to give power to certain individuals. If people would curate by themselves, it would be another matter.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A disadvantage of decentralisation is that with no clear figurehead or visionary leader, there is no direction.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Bitcoin doesn't seem to need one either :-)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think the only thing I don’t take seriously here is making use of my witness vote. I’d begin to do that so I’d know I do everything and participate in everything on here

0
0
0.000
avatar

Everyone has 30 witness votes! Use them!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly! We have a say in defining who runs the chain!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely you have said these things true that this project is going very well and the members are working very hard and within the time it will be famous all over the world.

0
0
0.000
avatar

@libertycrypto27, the HiQ Smart Bot has recognized your request (2/2) and will start the voting trail.

In addition, @achim03 gets !LOOL from @hiq.redaktion.

For further questions, check out https://hiq-hive.com or join our Discord. And don't forget to vote HiQs fucking Witness! 😻

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree with most of the points. I do think that decentralization is slowly getting better over time but I don't think it would be solved anytime soon. I am growing my HP and I prefer to curate myself. What is your view on curation trials versus delegating out HP?

0
0
0.000
avatar

The best solution in my opinion is to curate ourselves. The second best is to curate when we have time and follow a curation trail when we are not online. The third best is to delegate the hive power to several curation projects. This solution is for people who really don't have time to curate themselves.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Irrespective of all odds, hive is still the preferred blockchain.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Is your point that there should be more curation projects, so that there are more "groups" of people with decision power? Or just that it's good not to have too many whales so that they have more power to decide if a project can grow (and even exist) or not? (in my opoinion this would stand in the way of decentralization)
!HUG

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think that it would be very good for hive to have as many curation projects as possible out there. This would allow the best possible spread of votes and value which again is a great way to increase decentralisation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's indeed what I was thinking too... Decentralisation is very important and it astonishes me that a small group of people that have the time to sit hours behind their computer to make long posts tell people which wnat to make raffles and such, that they can't do this because that would be bad practice.... !BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

@svanbo, sorry!

You are out of hugs for today.

You can call the HUG bot a maximum of 3 per day.

The current call limits are:

HUG in walletcalls per day
01
12
103
0
0
0.000